Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. Please reply and address the points raised by Pascal Thubert (thank you Pascal!) in his internet directorate review at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09-intdir-telechat-thubert-2021-10-15/ or at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/qLMMP2d49xjKy_JXNCUo1DBOwVs/ With Pascal's review, I have only skimmed the document and have only 1 nit: please introduce references to IR/EVPN/PIM early in the text. I also wonder why the specific case of NVO is discussed in the document as I would assume that the issues are in all EVPN deployments. Pascal and I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
