Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This seems much improved in many ways; thanks very much. [S3.5] [comment] * For send-refresh of IPv6 addresses, I suspect the PE might use an IPv6 SA == unspecified address and an SLLA option with the MAC address equal to the PE sender MAC. Alternatively, if the PE has an IPv6 link-local address in the BD then it can just do the normal NS dance. But I'll defer to Eric Vyncke as I'm sure he has more experience in this area (where a device wishes to be "transparent" at the IP layer). Ah, I see in section 3.7 it's assumed that the PE has an IPv6 link-local address configured in the BD. [S3.7] [nit] * "legit" -> "legitimate" _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
