Thanks, I have fixed all what was mentioned below for the next revision.
Stephane -----Original Message----- From: Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> Sent: lundi 17 août 2020 13:46 To: Erik Kline <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [bess] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04: (with COMMENT) Hi Erik, On 8/17/20, 7:32 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Erik, On 8/16/20, 7:50 PM, "BESS on behalf of Erik Kline via Datatracker" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [[ comments ]] [ section 3 ] * Perhaps "8-octet RD is set to zero" -> "8-octet RD set to zero" [ section 4 ] * Perhaps "for which there is already solution" -> "for which there is already a solution" * "from the onset" -> "from the outset", I think I believe either is correct and I think "onset" is more common. I guess "onset" usually implies the start of something unpleasant, which would hopefully not be the case for supporting next-hops of both AFs __, so I would agree with your suggested change. Or it could simply be changed to "from the beginning" to avoid any confusion. https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-onset-and-vs-outset/ Thanks, Acee Thanks, Acee [ section 6.2 ] * "IPV4" -> "IPv4" [ section 6.3 ] * "IPV4" -> "IPv4" _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
