+1 Every technology has a number of trade-offs associated with it, one can’t assess gain/loss of a particular technology without understanding the architecture as a whole.
As long as we are comparing the technologies in the right context and based on their technical merits we come up with a great solution, that is what IETF does! Else... Regards, Jeff > On Oct 5, 2019, at 07:11, Krzysztof Szarkowicz <[email protected]> wrote: > > I second Robert. > > SRv6 is yet another tool in the overall toolset, and, as with every tool, > there are situations (use cases) where using this particular tool might be > the optimal solution, whereas there are use cases, where other tools do the > job better, and, there are use cases where using this particular tools is > complete misunderstanding. There as are as well use cases, where combinations > of multiple tools bring the best effect. > > Thanks, > Krzysztof > > >> On 2019-Oct-05, at 13:23, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> IMHO the question of SR-MPLS vs SRv6 is wrong as it all depends what are you >> trying to accomplish in your network and what services you need to run on it. >> >> For example some networks need TE some do not. >> >> Some may like to carry L2/L3VPNs some do not. >> >> Some may think about requirements associated with special packet handling >> perhaps augmented with in house development of P4 based fancy services so do >> not.. >> >> Last some network are IPv4 only, some are IPv4+MPLS, some may be dual stack >> and some may be IPv6 only. >> >> For some the overhead associated with attaching additional data to each >> packet matters - so do not care and do not even realize it :).. >> >> So this is very loaded question. It is like asking should I go left or >> should I go right without stating your ultimate destination. Sure likely you >> may end up there regardless how you turn but it may not be optimal path. >> >> And last as this is BESS WG ... I would really seriously consider for BESS >> services use of RFC4797 and RFC7510. >> >> Cheers, >> R. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 11:35 AM Lizhenbin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Gyna, >>> >>> We proposed following the draft which has relation with your question. Hope >>> it may be helpful. >>> >>> >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xie-spring-srv6-network-migration-00 >>> >>> >>> From my point of view, one of the best advantages of SRv6 is easy >>> incremental deployment. >>> >>> I believe there will more deployments of SRv6 soon. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Zhenbin (Robin) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 发件人: BESS [[email protected]] 代表 Gyan Mishra [[email protected]] >>> 发送时间: 2019年10月5日 8:22 >>> 收件人: [email protected] >>> 主题: [bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS >>> >>> >>> Bess, >>> >>> What is the benefit of SRv6 over SR-MPLS for greenfield deployments or >>> existing mpls deployments. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Gyan Mishra >>> IT Network Engineering & Technology >>> Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) >>> 13101 Columbia Pike FDC1 3rd Floor >>> Silver Spring, MD 20904 >>> United States >>> Phone: 301 502-1347 >>> Email: [email protected] >>> www.linkedin.com/in/GYAN-MISHRA-RS-SP-MPLS-IPV6-EXPERT >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BESS mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >> _______________________________________________ >> BESS mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
