On 17/12/15 13:30, Benoit Claise wrote: > 3) Is security section really a security section? It seems more like > “do this policy” or this will fail. It should get a stronger review from > the security directorate
I've not posted a ballot for this one as my question is more "What does P really stand for in this kind of VPN?" and I don't really get what here is new that requires a PS. So any security discuss would likely be met by "not new, can't change" and is therefore perhaps not the best use of our time. It'd be better if we could get some folks to try to re-instate the P == Private in VPN. (But that is admittedly very hard if one really has to do multicast.) S. _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
