Hi Stephen, It said "...using a strong security mechanism such as IPsec [RFC4301]". Here IPsec is just mentioned as an example of a strong security mechanism. Therefore, it doesn't exclude MACsec.
Best regards, Xiaohu > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 9:47 PM > To: Alvaro Retana (aretana); Xuxiaohu; The IESG > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-06: > (with > DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > > Hi, > > Can someone say why the mention of MACsec wasn't included? > As I understand it, MACsec is what's mostly usable for inter-DC security so > omitting it seems like a bad idea (or perhaps I'm misinformed) > > Thanks, > S. > > On 14/12/15 13:34, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote: > > Stephen: > > > > Hi! > > > > Xiaohu posted an update that we hope addresses your concerns. Pelase > > take a look. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Alvaro. > > > > _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
