On 2/5/15 9:29 AM, Thomas Morin wrote:
Adrian, Pete,
2015-02-05, Adrian Farrel:
I looked through the archive.
The comments from the contributor were responded to with a polite
email explaining how the authors disagreed and why.
The contributor (whose original comments were more like "I would do
it different") did not follow up, and in the absence of that the
response form the authors seems to have reasonably addressed the
comments.
Thanks Adrian.
I came to the same conclusion when preparing the write-up ; this is
why I'm confident that the work is well supported.
-Thomas -----Original Message-----
Perfect. Thanks for checking.
pr
From: Pete Resnick [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 05 February 2015 00:54
To: The IESG
Cc: [email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Pete Resnick's No Objection on
draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community-
09: (with COMMENT)
Pete Resnick has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In the ballot:
Opposition to the proposal was initially expressed by one
contributor,
but there was good support for adoption and no particular follow-up
from that contributor.
I'm glad someone wrote it down, but it's not exactly confidence
inspiring. Was this just random opposition without explanation, or did
the person have a point and it got addressed to the chairs'
satisfaction,
or did something get dropped? I expect it's that the concern was
addressed reasonably, but the above doesn't exactly say that.
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
