2007/10/12, Matthew Whipple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I'll leave Jenda to answer whether it's a good use of his module. > > I'd say if this works for your situation then it works (if there aren't > any problems with the users whose mail you are forwarding and their mail > clients). I'd still advocate the resending of the original message. I
Yes, and that is still my very first question I want to know how... =) But I don't know, so my own way is to simulate it. ( just for problem solving to make my work done ) would suggest if you send the messages as attachments that you don't > forge the From address to be the original sender. It seems like good > netiquette to not impersonate, and if you leave it as an address you > have access to you'd be notified of bounces or other potential issues > (in addition to avoiding any potential security problems with the SMTP > server). You can add a Reply-To header with the original address to That's a great idea! I made the modifies. make life easier on the mail recipient, and then also include the > original sender's address either in the subject or somewhere else > convenient (possibly in the From header as the descriptive name and not > the address). I'm guessing the SMTP server isn't actually "localhost"? Ha ! It is localhost, I ran a mail server on my own computer for testing purpose. =) Again, thank you very much for all the hint and help!! Panda-X
