On Jul 13, 12:54 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > There's nothing wrong with using shorthand descriptions provided you > don't forget what they are short for. It seems to me that your > problems arise from using shorthand descriptions then basing your > expectations on a literal interpretation of those descriptions. > I think you're right, I'm not understanding what I'm doing. Time for more RTFM so I can understand this stuff a little better! > > Having an array where element 0 is of one structure and all the others > are of another sounds like the wrong implementation. > I agree, its just what I happened to create - what would you suggest, and what would be the syntax for that?
Thanks for all your answers, I did what you said and my program works properly now! I have a high regard for Usenet and and this help you've provided has reinforced that opinion even further. Thanks again! Inventor -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
