"Oleg V. Volkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [skip] > Speaking of globals, AFAIK, I have virtually no drawbacks > against "my", as long as I use "our" variables inside > the scope. So what's bad there in using "our"?
After some thinking I've found a scenario where Alias::attr use of globals can give some not immideately obvious results: if you use it for recursive function and do not pass all the fields, some variables named after keys that are absent in current call will be still initialized from previous. This won't matter with, say, object, which uses restricted hash or otherwise explicly initializes all the hash fields on creation, but this may easily mess up recursive function with named parameters. -- Oleg "Rowaa[SR13]" V. Volkov -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
