On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:27:06PM -0400, Ryan Frantz wrote:
> 
> Personally, I don't mind it either way as I always double-check my
> replies and their destinations to be sure they're what I intended.  Just
> because email is fast and convenient, doesn't mean that we should ignore
> simple steps such as double-checking ourselves.  I mean, you wouldn't
> forget to check the number of zeroes you wrote on that check to the
> utility company, would you?

I tend to agree with the principles on which you base your opinion, but
I don't think they're properly applied here, necessarily.  I've never
been subscribed to any other interactive email list that didn't default
the reply-to header to the list address, as far as I recall.  I don't
think I'm alone in that.  As such, this handling of it seems to violate
the POLS without sufficient "return on investment" to justify it.  What
I see here is a lot of messages accidentally sent to individuals when
they are meant for the list.  In addition to that, many MUAs and email
clients (yeah, there's a difference) don't even support the list-reply
header and, while that's a problem for standards-compliant mail
handling, it doesn't change the fact that their users end up in a very
confusing state with regards to this list.

Your particular manner of handling this seems suboptimal, as well.
Rather than reply only to the list, you send a group reply that targets
both the list and the individual.  As such, I received two copies of the
same email, one of which wouldn't allow me to list-reply so that when I
tried to reply to the list it failed, and I had to close that copy then
open the other to reply.  It's not a huge burden, but it is a sign of a
less than perfect manner of handling the situation.  Do you, perhaps,
lack an email client that properly handles the list-reply header
yourself?

-- 
Chad Perrin [ CCD CopyWrite | http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
"A script is what you give the actors.  A program
is what you give the audience." - Larry Wall

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>


Reply via email to