On 4/25/06, Mr. Shawn H. Corey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-25-04 at 15:37 -0400, Jay Savage wrote: > > Seriously, though, go easy on the pruning. The rule of tumb is is that > > the message should include enough information that a person joining > > the thread can make sense of the response from the response itself. > > Unless the OP is particulalry verbose, the question is particularly > > complex, or your reposne is to a very specific issue in the post or > > previous comment, you'll want to be careful about pruning. Text is > > cheap: err on the side of pity for people who don't have threaded > > email clients. > > And spelling checkers are useflul. >
Nah, I like my tumb. -- j -------------------------------------------------- This email and attachment(s): [ ] blogable; [ x ] ask first; [ ] private and confidential daggerquill [at] gmail [dot] com http://www.tuaw.com http://www.dpguru.com http://www.engatiki.org values of β will give rise to dom!
