[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

which ultimately makes the 50 or 60 line script you sent originally about 10 lines or less. (IE by using the array of array setup instead of some convoluted matrix that is structured god know how.

That means in six months when you (or heaven forbid me) have to maintain your code we don't have to figure what you were smoking to get what you were after and what you personally define as a matrix and how you'd structure and access the data in said matrix, etc etc


Whatever is fueling the need for you to blow things out of such proportion? I suggest that you refrain from trying to insult my or any other person's intelligence who come to this mailing list seeking

I meant no offense, only that calling an array reference an array reference immediately is easier to work with than trying to understand how this instance is applying some obscure idea of a matrix, thats all :)

help. You know as well as I do that the original script that I sent was executing a push inside a while fetch loop, which is just another way to do it ---> big deal. Is that so complicated??? No. If things

but confusing to others and probably yourself in six months.

run efficiently and correctly either way does it really matter? Did you include the number of lines in selectall_arrayref() sub too? -- Who cares?

ok, now *you're* getting insulting, I'm very sorry I spent my own time trying to help you become a better programmer. I'm sorry if my trying to keep it detailed and light was taken as an insult.

My post came about because of a fundamental misunderstanding of what is actually going on. The communication of what I believed to be true does not change what is actually happening, although it seems to do that for you. Or is it that you spend to much time wanting to negate someone's statements? I communicated things incorrectly and you sit here and speculate these things and make these comments and honestly I am only left to wonder who really finds you as beneficial as you think

ok, so in what way is writing clearer, cleaner, more efficient code not beneficial?

and why are you so mad about some inferred insult based on your ego being hurt when you are doing it yourself blantenly and much worse?

that you are. I know ~I'm~ still learning. I go back and rewrite my subs all the time as my knowledge progresses.

I'm not really sure who'd want you to maintain their code, but rest

If you only knew..., this address is a sort of anonymous pseudonym for me that the jupiterhost folks let me use, hehe :)

Again you missed the point: code will be maintained, by you or someone else, so make it easier to do that by writing good code initially.

assured you wont ever have to worry about maintaining mine.

Wow, now that was an insult not even slightly hidden in banter and had no practical lesson attached...

The point I was trying to help you see is this:

If you are learning, learn the right practices early and you will save yourself much headache in the future (IE understanding your old code, rewriting code you know see as bad *and* relearning good practices). You won't understand that now but you will later on down the road.

So to sum up, do whatever you want, don't take anyone's sage advise, I just wish I could get my time back from trying to help you gain good practices from the start.

I'll reply no further to pointless insults from you at this point, I tried to help and wish I hadn't now.

Sorry you're overly sensitive, hopefully you'll be able work that out with your therapist and medication and see the valuable lessons that I attempted pass on.

good day

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>


Reply via email to