that's a bit more then we really wanted to get into for this project, plus portability is going to be an issue too. So it can be installed on serveral differnet servers. So we are thinking it be much easier to install either the Apache or CGI session modules. HTML::Mason is alot more then we really need. But appreciate the feedback.
Thx's
-- Mike<mickalo>Blezien =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Thunder Rain Internet Publishing Providing Internet Solutions that work! http://www.thunder-rain.com Quality Web Hosting http://www.justlightening.net MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Kevin Old wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 15:50, Mike Blezien wrote:
Hello,
We are in the process of setting up a session management system for a complex membership system project. I've been reading through the docs on CGI::Session and Apache::Session and was hoping to get some feedback if one is preferred over another, the pros and cons of using one over another,... portability advantages,...etc. So anyone that's use both of these modules, any recommendations would be much appreciated.
Mike,
I recommend using HTML::Mason and the MasonX::Request::WithApacheSession module which does all the work for you. It is basically a Mason interface to Apache::Session.
I am working on a HOWTO for setting up a basic session with it, as the POD isn't easy to follow.
HTH, Kevin
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
