Well, this whole rpm thing is killing me. In the past, I've always used option --prefix for my configure. I guess, I either have to learn rpm, just wait for someone to build it (I wonder if all rpm are the same for the same product?), or just rpm -e and go back to my old ways ;)
There's just too much out there! thanks > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> is this version old? >> >> $ perl -MCGI -e 'print $CGI::VERSION' >> 2.89$ >> > > Well, it is currently the same as mine, but it is dated 10/16/2002 on > CPAN. There does appear to be a 3.00 on CPAN dated 08/18/2003. > > We could get into the whole debate about whether one should always try > to keep pace with what is fresh on CPAN or whether your situation > designates that you should do the proper examination of change logs, and > testing before just willy-nilly upgrading all of your CPAN modules. But > then that is very situation based... so I will say the reason I have the > 2.89 version is because I am lazy and don't do the proper amount of > testing when I am just working on my own web page since I doubt anyone > looks at it anyway so who cares if it is broken... at work I would be > beaten into submission if I just decided to upgrade the modules for our > app because it was, say, the second tuesday of the month, rather than > because I had planned to, and had done the proper regression testing... > > Then there is that whole rpm/non-rpm version dependency issue.... > > Did that really help? Ok, so it has been a year, maybe it is time to > upgrade ;-)... > > http://danconia.org > > > ----------------------------------------- eMail solutions by http://www.swanmail.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
