I'd be interested to see how that works. Would you mind sharing? -Dan
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 17:05, Dan Muey wrote: > No thanks. I have a 99.9% fool proof system. > > Any email comes in and the sender is sent a notice to verify them selves. > Which they do via a web based form then it is passed on. > -That way autoreply functions don't automatically verify them. > - what about submitting the form automatically you say? > - they have to enter text that is randomly generated in an image into > the form. > - each string can only be used once and for a limited amoutn > of time so trying every combonation > (they only get 5 chances) or looking at the form's > source and using the value's in it won't work. > > Each user can personally specify which file extensions/and > mime types they don't want. > Also you can automatically set unknown user's to default to > plain/text only untill they are verified and I set their address to be allowed > certain types. > > It would be 100% fool proof but they can always send as a verified email account. > But that's why I, personally have, most people's email changed to > plain/text and others only allow images. That way they can spam me all day long but > There will be 100% no viruses. ( of course it's not on this email addrss as it's a > stupid exchange account, doh!) > > What about valid email that won't get verified, like the verification and info for > your next airplane trip? > There's a web based queue manager where you can view and forward on to your self any > messages that havn't been > Verified. > > It's quite slick really, and all in perl I might add, bring it full circle! > > Yes multilayered security is good. > > Ok I'm really finished, > > See you all later > > Dmuey -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
