Hi:
The following is a note from a colleague of which I am skeptical:
"fyi....
.pl used to be used for both executables and libraries.
A library is simply perl code located in a different file which is
imported into another perl program with the 'require' keyword.
Now that we have the .plx convention (and of course the extension
doesn't
affect perl's behavior at all) we can have .pl stand only for
libraries
and .plx stand for executables."
Are any of the rest of you conforming to this? I'm not sure if he's
referring to modules (ext. .pm) when he says "libraries", either.
--
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender
does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
