[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I was hoping someone would correct me, if you have? ;-)
Although I could make a correction!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Rob's suggestion that you lack a package statement for Train could be
> it, it could also be that Train exports 'new', which is placing it in
> the current namespace, then you are redefining it. Probably you
> shouldn't export 'new' if it is.
I don't think your option is possible. If Train was adding
ScheduleDay::new to the symbol table, then the message
would be:
Subroutine new redefined at ScheduleDay.pm line 7.
as it would see the definition that Train provided first.
Cheers,
Rob
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
