He forgot to mention the:

use Advil;

$pills = new Advil(2);
unless($pills->take(orally)) {
  sleep 40;
}

http://danconia.org


------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:22:19 -0500 (EST), "Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> On Dec 6, Paul Johnson said:
> 
> >On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 11:58:37AM -0500, Danny Miller wrote:
> >
> >> Strictly speaking, ++$count is faster than $count++.
> >
> >Strictly speaking, perl will convert $count++ to ++$count if it can.
> 
> Strictly speaking, there is another major difference no one has mentioned
> yet (and that many people might have trouble understanding).  Using
> $count++ returns a NUMBER OR STRING, and then increments $count's value.
> ++$count increments $count's value, and returns THE SCALAR ITSELF.
> 
> How does this matter?  Well, watch:
> 
>   $i = 2;
>   $j = ++$i / ++$i;
> 
> What do you think $j will be?  3/4?  Nope.  4/4, or 1.  The reason is
> because the ++$i form is a "footnote" type of thing.  Basically it means
> "increment $i, but leave $i here" whereas $i++ means "return $i's value,
> and then increment it".
> 
> Want to have your mind hurt?
> 
>   $i = 2;
>   @j = (++$i, ++$i, ++$i);
> 
> What do you think @j will be?  (5,5,5)?  Yes, it will.  The elements of
> the list ARE $i themselves, and each element's expression increments $i
> once; so $i becomes 5, and then the list is ($i, $i, $i), and all those
> are 5.  (Contrast this with ($i++, $i++, $i++), where the list is (2,3,4),
> NOT ($i,$i,$i).)
> 
> Here's the brain-hurting:
> 
>   $i = 2;
>   $j = ++$i + ++$i + ++$i;
> 
> What do you think $j will be?  3 + 4 + 5 = 12?  No.  5 + 5 + 5 = 15?  No.
> (NO!?)  It will be 13.  4 + 4 + 5.  HOW does Perl manage that?  It's
> because ++$i isn't executed until it's reached, and the THIRD one isn't
> reached until the first two have been evaluated:
> 
>   $j = (++$i + ++$i) + ++$i;
>   # ++$i sets $i to 3
>   # ++$i sets $i to 4
>   # ($i + $i) returns 8
>   # ++$i sets $i to 5
>   # 8 + $i returns 15
> 
> CRAZY.  Or logical.  Both, really.
> 
> Oops.  This is [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sorry. ;)
> 
> -- 
> Jeff "japhy" Pinyan      [EMAIL PROTECTED]      http://www.pobox.com/~japhy/
> RPI Acacia brother #734   http://www.perlmonks.org/   http://www.cpan.org/
> <stu> what does y/// stand for?  <tenderpuss> why, yansliterate of course.
> [  I'm looking for programming work.  If you like my work, let me know.  ]
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to