I realize this is not protecting me from anything really. It originally
started out as a question of curiosity..._That's all_.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Fowler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: hiding a URL


> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:07:59PM -0400, George Gunderson wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, Sep 10, 2002, at 18:45 US/Eastern, Michael Fowler wrote:
> > >What is the purpose of trying to "hide" the URL from a user?  However
you
> > >obscure the URL the user must still be able to access the CGI script.
>
> > For me, its h4x0r paranoia.  The more a script looks like a static html
> > file, the better, IMHO.  Not that it will stop or even slow down an
> > attacker, I do it anyway whenever possible.
>
> I don't understand this logic.  You know it won't help protect you against
> an attacker, but you do it anyway.  Surely you must think it protects you
> from something to continue doing it.
>
>
> > For Jose, it may be something as simple as him not wanting his users to
> > have to type so much.
>
> This makes a little more sense to me, though I'm hard-pressed to think of
a
> site where knowing the URL to a CGI script proved useful..
>
>
> I guess to each his own.
>
>
> Michael
> --
> Administrator                      www.shoebox.net
> Programmer, System Administrator   www.gallanttech.com
> --
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to