Felix Geerinckx wrote:
>
> Now you're talking.
> But just for the fun of it, run the benchmark again with the OP's original
> (much longer) string ... ;-)
>

i will do that a bit later. :-) busy doing something else...
yes, the reason why the string is much shorter is becasue i am lazy to 
type... believe it or not, my news reader do not allow(for some unknown 
reason) me to copy and paste outside of it's own window!

david 


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to