On Monday, May 6, 2002, at 09:47 , Jason Frisvold wrote:
> Yeah, I thought of doing it that way too.... However, my purpose was to > skip the "unnecessary" step and pump the data right into variables. > This way I "drop" the memory needed to go that extra step and I retain > readability of code... http://www.wetware.com/drieux/pbl/BenchMarks/twoForOneForLooper.txt I'm not sure that there really is any good arbitration based upon either speed or 'readability' - at present I haven't thought about how to do the 'measure for size' solution.... ciao drieux --- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
