> It's my understanding that the difference between
>
> &some_func;
>
> and
>
> some_func();
>
> is that the '&' invocation passes the original contents of @_ into
> some_func, whereas the '()' invocation has an empty @_ in some_func. In the
> first instance, some_func has access to the arguments of the calling
> function.
Good to know. What happens in the case where I do something as
follows (which I do often and so far successfully)..
&some_func("$var1","$var2","$var3");
?
===================
Shaun Fryer
===================
London Webmasters
http://LWEB.NET
PH: 519-858-9660
FX: 519-858-9024
===================
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
