On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Michael Lamertz wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 01:45:27PM +0200, Elias Assmann wrote: > > > If the Perl script is the last thing the batch file executes, I don't > > really see a problem, since you could just let the Perl script emit > > the error/success message. That might leave you with the problem of > > exiting the batch script with the correct exit code, but I don't know > > how the NT shell does these things (Bash shells exit with the exit > > code their last command exited with IIRC; an eval might also take care > > of the problem). > > But the old DOS shells don't have 'eval' either.
Did I say eval? Oops, I meant exec of course :-) Elias -- "There are people who don't like capitalism, and there are people who don't like PCs, but there's no one who likes the PC who doesn't like Microsoft." -- Bill Gates -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]