On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Michael Lamertz wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 01:45:27PM +0200, Elias Assmann wrote:
>
> > If the Perl script is the last thing the batch file executes, I don't
> > really see a problem, since you could just let the Perl script emit
> > the error/success message. That might leave you with the problem of
> > exiting the batch script with the correct exit code, but I don't know
> > how the NT shell does these things (Bash shells exit with the exit
> > code their last command exited with IIRC; an eval might also take care
> > of the problem).
>
> But the old DOS shells don't have 'eval' either.

Did I say eval? Oops, I meant exec of course :-)

        Elias

-- 
"There are people who don't like capitalism, and there are people who don't like PCs,
but there's no one who likes the PC who doesn't like Microsoft."
 -- Bill Gates


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to