>>>>> "Timothy" == Timothy Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Timothy> If you don't take offense, then why did you reply? Because there was also content in that reply, as there is in this one. Timothy> If everyone only did exactly what they were told was the Timothy> right way, there would be no Perl. Inapplicable premise, *and* false conclusion. Thus, not relevant. Timothy> Most of the time what they were told turns out to be right, Timothy> but you can't expect everyone to take your word at everything Timothy> without fully understanding why. The "why" has been presented here many times, as well as in the FAQ and in other online discussions. I'm not asking anyone to respect the answer simply by fiat, but I *do* expect someone of reasonable intelligence when told "it can't be done" and "we already said why" to at least research what has been already said first. And now we are gravely close to off topic (some would say "past"), so I'll appreciate any further replies in private email, please. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
