On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 14:27, Balint, Jess wrote:
> After hours of pondering and sitting in wonder of simple it is, I have come
> up with something. I do believe that this:
>
> for my $i (0..$#keys) {
>
> Quite possibly should be
>
> foreach ( @keys ) {
>
> Otherwise, why would you have
>
> my @keys = (0, 1, 2, 3);
>
> Instead of just $keys = 3 and then 0..$keys. If there is any wrong in this
> thinking, please lemme know. Thank you.
>
> -Jess
>
<snip />
Bugger me. This is what I get for just rattling off code and testing it
for superficial correctness. It was originally $fields[$keys[$i]] as I
was using $i for debug purposes. Then I scrapped that design, but kept
the bulk of the code around since some of it was useful, and this stayed
when I should have change the loop to
foreach my $i ( @keys ) {
That's twice today I feel like an idiot. Also the "#eval method, ugly"
comment is not supposed to be there. It too is a relic of the original
hack to get it working (which got discarded as being far, far to ugly).
--
Today is Pungenday the 38th day of Chaos in the YOLD 3168
Or is it?
Missle Address: 33:48:3.521N 84:23:34.786W
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
