On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 22:34, Scott R. Godin wrote: > I've noticed that near 99% of the spam I receive uses this method to > mask it from reciept, so typically I filter this with my mailer into a > dumping ground, but the sheer amount of spam lately (235 items since Nov > 5th) has caused me to form a desire to tackle this more forthrightly and > aggressively.
I've been playing with Vipul's Razor recently - http://razor.sf.net/ It's a distributed system for identifying spam; anyone who receives a spam sends a SHA-1 identifier back to be propagated, and everyone running a local server can reject based on this hash. It's probably overkill for me, but it sounds like you get enough spam to use it - assuming you have control of the machine your mail comes to. (which I'll assume, based on your mail address of webmaster@) Just an idea, - ~C. -- $a="printf.net"; Chris Ball | chris@void.$a | www.$a | finger: chris@$a As to luck, there's the old miners' proverb: Gold is where you find it. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
