On 26/04/2014 02:16, Uri Guttman wrote:
On 04/25/2014 12:55 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Uri Guttman <u...@stemsystems.com> writes:
why would you expect anything but 1 as the value? shift will return 1
value or undef. that anon array will be dereferenced to an array with
1 entry. the array is in scalar context which returns its
size. elementary!
^ my dear Watson.
Thank you Mr Uri (The Snot) Guttman, for the usual helpful but snotty
response. I do appreciate it.
i do support all the time for pay and for free. your response is
snottier than anything i said. i was talking about your code, not YOU.
you were insulting me directly. there is a difference. also my replies
about code are for all on this list to learn from. don't take code
review so personally.
It is a common defence to claim that you were not criticising a *person*
but instead something that they created / did / believed etc. Randal
Schwartz used it a lot when he posted here more regularly.
In the same vein, Harry wasn't insulting *you* directly, he was
criticising your *response* and your *attitude*, and I agree with him.
I am sure that makes you feel much better.
Rob
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/
