On Jan 28, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Jim Gibson wrote: > This is known as a "negative lookahead assertion" and uses the (?!...) > construct:
Thanks, everyone. I went with the negative lookahead that Jim mentioned. It works like a charm! Thanks again, Angela
On Jan 28, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Jim Gibson wrote: > This is known as a "negative lookahead assertion" and uses the (?!...) > construct:
Thanks, everyone. I went with the negative lookahead that Jim mentioned. It works like a charm! Thanks again, Angela