From: Shlomi Fish <shlo...@iglu.org.il> > > This because you can very well represent XML in Perl data structures > > without any loss of complexity. See for example XML::Compile. > > Wrong! If for example you have something like {{{ <p>Hello this is a <a > href="http://www.example.tld/">link for something</a></p> }}}, then > XML-Simple > will make a mess out of it. And XML-Simple tends to break more often than > not, > and is philosopically unsound.
Lovely. So you just found a type of XMLs that is and never was meant to be handled by XML::Simple and no one would ever suggest using XML::Simple for. Besides Dr. Ruud talked about XML::Compile, not XML::Simple in that sentence. > > > }}}}}}}}}}}} > > > > Double-yuck. > > I still don't understand why you dislike me having quoting-designators. 'cause they are horribly overdone. It's like finishing sentences by ten exclamation marks!!!!!!!!!!!! XML::LibXML is overdesigned overcomplicated horribly documented comitee-designed thing. But everyone to his or her own tastes. Jenda ===== je...@krynicky.cz === http://Jenda.Krynicky.cz ===== When it comes to wine, women and song, wizards are allowed to get drunk and croon as much as they like. -- Terry Pratchett in Sourcery -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org http://learn.perl.org/