From: Shlomi Fish <shlo...@iglu.org.il>
> > This because you can very well represent XML in Perl data structures
> > without any loss of complexity. See for example XML::Compile.
> 
> Wrong! If for example you have something like {{{ <p>Hello this is a <a 
> href="http://www.example.tld/";>link for something</a></p> }}}, then 
> XML-Simple 
> will make a mess out of it. And XML-Simple tends to break more often than 
> not, 
> and is philosopically unsound.

Lovely. So you just found a type of XMLs that is and never was meant 
to be handled by XML::Simple and no one would ever suggest using 
XML::Simple for.

Besides Dr. Ruud talked about XML::Compile, not XML::Simple in that 
sentence.

> > > }}}}}}}}}}}}
> > 
> > Double-yuck.
> 
> I still don't understand why you dislike me having quoting-designators.

'cause they are horribly overdone. It's like finishing sentences by 
ten exclamation marks!!!!!!!!!!!!

XML::LibXML is overdesigned overcomplicated horribly documented 
comitee-designed thing. But everyone to his or her own tastes.

Jenda
===== je...@krynicky.cz === http://Jenda.Krynicky.cz =====
When it comes to wine, women and song, wizards are allowed 
to get drunk and croon as much as they like.
        -- Terry Pratchett in Sourcery


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/


Reply via email to