C.DeRykus wrote:
> On Dec 8, 1:57 am, dery...@gmail.com (C.DeRykus) wrote:
>> On Dec 8, 12:08 am, an...@melerit.se (Anders Hartman) wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>
>> ...
>> Also, in this case, I'd write the eval for compile-time and check
>> for errors:
>>
>> eval { asub() };
>> die $@ if $@;
>>
>
> No, sorry, that's a "useless use of eval" since you could just call
> the sub directly. Since, the intent was to define and call the sub
> dynamically though, checking for eval errors is still a good idea.
No, it's not. If asub() has a die or it calls a sub that has one, this
will catch the die. Also for croak, et al.
--
Just my 0.00000002 million dollars worth,
Shawn
Programming is as much about organization and communication
as it is about coding.
I like Perl; it's the only language where you can bless your
thingy.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/
