This is probably an oldie, but assigning an undef to a hash creates a hash with a single element (which I'm guessing is undef). Isn't this counter intuitive. I would have expected the hash to be empty if the undef that is assigned is in scalar context. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Why does %hdata = undef; not work as expected Mark Maunder
- Re: Why does %hdata = undef; not work as expected Troy Denkinger
- Re: Why does %hdata = undef; not work as expected Troy Denkinger
- RE: Why does %hdata = undef; not work as expected Bob Showalter
- Re: Why does %hdata = undef; not work as expected Mark Maunder