On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:25:53PM -0700, Paul wrote: > > > Also, if you were to only include @_, would you need a comma after it > > Nope, but it's good style, in case you add more stuff later. Might I suggest that in this case it's actually _bad_ style? The reason is that any new defaults should be added _before_ the @_, whereas the comma is suggesting that they should be added after. -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net
- class definition Nick Transier
- Re: class definition Jos I. Boumans
- Re: class definition Bradford Ritchie
- Re: class definition Paul
- Re: class definition Paul Johnson
- Re: class definition Brett W. McCoy