Thanks folks, this is ANOTHER module I'm going to start using.....
I have to say that this is a lot more fun than counting clock cycles, which
was the last bench-marking I did a long, long time ago...
regards,
Richard
At 19:53 7/06/2001 -0700, Peter Cornelius wrote:
>Looking at the other posting to this I realize I should have included the
>open and close in the test block. That makes the results...
>Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of Randals, variations...
> Randals: 16 wallclock secs ( 6.00 usr + 10.05 sys = 16.05 CPU) @ 622.98/s
>(n=10000)
>variations: 3 wallclock secs ( 1.22 usr + 1.94 sys = 3.17 CPU) @
>3159.56/s (n=10000)
