On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:44 PM, <bu...@alejandro.ceballos.info> wrote:
> > Found the solution (my apologies). > > I am receiving both an scalar, the second one as a reference, then it must > be assigned to an other var. > > No. It does not have to be assigned to another var. Instead you should dereference the reference. sub dosomething > { > ($myopt,$myparams) = @_; > ## %myparams = $myparams; # skip the asssignment and creation oa a > new hash > print "opt = $myopt\n"; > #### while( my ($k, $v) = each %myparams ) while( my ($k, $v) = each %{$myparams} ) # dereference the reference with %{$ref} > { print "$k = $v \n"; } > } > > The assignment you had assigns the hash reference to a key of the hash you created, with nothing assigned as a value. It is a real, real bad idea (for many reasons) to create variables of different types with the same names. A major benefit of passing a reference is that you only move one item, the reference, instead of the entire hash. It doesn't make a lot of difference in this case, but if you had a hash with thousands of key/value pairs passing a reference and using that reference uses just a few bytes of memory. Copying the entire hash uses many thousands of bytes. Happy hacking, Mike