On Thursday, Sep 4, 2003, at 17:55 US/Pacific, Hanson, Rob wrote: [..]
[..]
I agree... but only if you are looking for a strong permanant solution. The regex way is good for quick and dirty HTML work.
technically we agree right up to the 'quick and dirty' part...
I mean, how many times have we watched something snappy witty, erudite, and a candidate for PerlGolf wind up becoming institutionalized in some one's "process document".
I think the amount of time that a person takes mastering the various HTML::* modules will pay major dividends in the long run as they have more and more
quick fix scripts
already to fire 'the next time' as well as a leg up on making sure that there is a better way to 'do it right the first time'.
ciao drieux
---
It could just be my OCD, but if I could have hammered flat every FROOOTLOOP who wanted merely a 'quick and dirty' one time only fix, 'honest, it's just this one time', rather than actually cure the root cause problem, WE would be on a flat earth from all the pounding....
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
