I have written a small perl prog which does something similar to PHP and the like, it reads HTML files and replaces 'markers' with values, objects and stuff to complete the web page.
The thing is I have several (and more to come) pages to apply this method to, the reason I am going about it this way rather than just pure Perl with embedded HTML is for easy manipulation of HTML templates (As someone else [hopefullly] will be updating these pages.) What I would like to know is whether it would be better to create one master (or monster if you like) CGI script to handle all of these? Or create a separate scripts based on the original with specific bits? I am currently swinging toward the later, as it would be less labour intensive to setup and roll-out (ie I'm lazy!). The only thing stopping me is I feel the first option is a better option, what would swing me around is if there is any benefit in having ONE SCRIPT with respect to Apache's caching of CGI scripts. I am running under Apache/1.3.26 (Unix) with Perl 5.00404 :o? Any information gratefully received. TommyGun. -- Personalised email by http://another.com -- Personalised email by http://another.com
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
