Bob, > CGI.pm--a threat to our way of life! Down with the troglodytes! :) Well, not exactly my point, but ok :) Just kidding I just think there are too many who close their minds to anything but CGI.pm, including potentially more efficient customized solutions.
David ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Showalter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:33 AM Subject: RE: Displaying Problems > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:12 AM > To: Bob Showalter; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Displaying Problems > > > Bob, > > ... > So what exactly is the RFC2616 compliant content type? cf. ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2616.txt, section 2.2 > > You know its funny, but it seems that so many who stick up > for CGI.pm so strongly are quick to say > that CGI.pm is doing things right and that it does them > better, but they seem to purposely avoid > giving the actual solution. See above. > > It seems to me that our way of life (freedom and prosperity) > came about from people thinking for > them selves and from innovation, learning and continued drive > to improve what was given us. > I do a little system admin on the side, and I've come to find > that learning the actual conf files is > such a boon over simply using the GUI app. So much > understanding has come and it takes me to a more > advanced level. Many times I can discover a problem, or have > understanding of the underlying > problem when coming across things I don't expect. In my mind > programming is the same. I want to > know what's going on, so I can make a wise and educated > decision of how to approach it. CGI.pm--a threat to our way of life! Down with the troglodytes! :) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
