In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jimmy Lewis) wrote:

> I have a project where the CGI form is being displayed in Netscape as raw
> HTML but in IE it works fine. Are you familiar with this problem?

which version of netscape

does your form pass the validator test at http://validator.w3.org/ for 
being clean html or xhtml? 

what version of CGI.pm are you using on the remote site? 
(2.78 is current)
#!perl
#test.cgi
use CGI;
print header(), start_html(),
        div({-align=>'center'}, h3("CGI Version"), h4($CGI::VERSION) ),
        end_html;

most of todays web browsers don't fully support HTML 4 

which is, IMHO akin to not fully supporting ASCII, a basic minimalistic 
standard. 

it's NOT as complex as xhtml, and I don;t expect all of today's 
so-called-"modern" browsers to support it, although I firmly believe 
they should be held at gunpoint until they do, but support for HTML 4 
(which has been released and "standard" since 1997) is mandatory. 

far far too many web-designers haven't "gotten" the fact that 
<center></center> is deprecated and should instead be replaced with the 
division center tag <div align="center"></div>, even. 

It's pitiful. Here we are racing madly ahead with every other technology 
possible, EXCEPT that which makes coding web-pages easier, more 
standardized, encouraging straightforward practices that lead to cleaner 
code particularly in light of xhtml's requirements... but what are we 
doing? living in the stone-age of HTML back from before 1997. 

Everyone's SO scared of scaring customers with broken web-browsers away 
from their sites, that they practically ENCOURAGE the browser 
manufacturers to continue their sloppy practices. 

"I curl my lip at you, you shoddy browser-manufacturing-person." 
*snicker* :D

-- 
Scott R. Godin            | e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Laughing Dragon Services  |    web : http://www.webdragon.net/

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to