At 12:31 19.06.2001 +0000, Mel Matsuoka wrote:
> >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Rejected Message
> >Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:46:45 +0000
> >
> >Content-Type: text/plain;
> >
> >The attached mail message has been rejected for the following reason:
> >
> >Body contains word/phrase 'D*mn ' >
> >Additional Information:
> >
> > <headers snipped and offending word censored from quoted original message>
> >
> >it can to preserve your Access97 table relations, and for the most part
> >does a decent job. It converts the data and fieldtypes pretty d*mn
> >accurately. But you should still check its results by hand before yo go
<snip>
>I know this is inefficient and slow, though. And I didnt even use
>regular-expfressions either!:P What would be a more robust and efficient
>way to accomplish something like this?
How about this:
print qq{
Mature adults are allowed to read and write whatever the hell they want
to. Apart from the important idea that slang enriches and broadens our
language, no one has the right to censor our speech, especially in
something as personal as our correspondence, in whatever form it happens to
be in. Can you imagine the mess that would come about if the US Postal
Service began opening up envelopes and striking out words with a red pen?
Don't child-proof our world!
};
Aaron Craig
Programming
iSoftitler.com
