Well, interestingly, DBD-ODBC works fine here at the office, and on my Win2K
platform at home. However, it doesn't like (or isn't liked by) my Windows
ME machine at home, resulting in an illegal instruction in PWS (Pretty Weak
Software) every time. Of course, I hate Windows ME anyway, so to h*** with
it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Bergeron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 1:56 PM
> To: Kris Cook; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: database
>
>
> Have you not tried DBD-ODBC?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Kris Cook"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon Jun 18 08:30:16 PDT 2001
> Subject: database
>
> >I'm curious. Why, when the ODBC functionality is distributed with
> >ActiveState's Perl, do all examples I see in this group use DBI? The
> >application I'm working on uses an Access database, and I
> can't find Access
> >drivers for DBD, so DBI is useless to me, along with every
> example using it.
> >I'd LOVE to use DBI - placeholders in SQL alone are enough
> reason to switch
> >- but it doesn't appear to be an option. It's very frustrating.
> >
> >And no, the database isn't, at least right now, an option -
> it's a customer
> >thing, y'know.
> >
> >
> >___________________________________________
> >Kristopher Cook (mailto:\\[EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >e-Commerce Director
> >Galyan's Trading Company
> >(317) 532-0200 x239
> >(317) 532-0258 (fax)
> >
>
> /~_. _ | _ _ _ _
> \_/|(_||| | |(_)| |
> _|
> ___________________________________________________
> GO.com Mail
> Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com
>
>
