As it seems most of these plugins are based on beangrow, I'm (slightly)
hijacking this thread to ask if people noticed deviations from computed
returns with beangrow vs. returns reported by fund managers, especially in
the case where dividends are reinvested immediately and don't go through a
"cash" phase.
For instance, this transaction is not considered as dividend by beangrow
and hence fund performance are reduced because of that:
2023-09-26 * "REINVEST - DIV - DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT"
Assets:US:Vanguard:Roth:VTI 0.817 VTI {212.9008 USD}
Income:US:Vanguard:Roth:Dividends:VTI -173.94 USD
If you have reinvested dividends and use beangrow to compute returns,
please check that the numbers you get make sense. I made a pull request in
beangrow to address that issue:
https://github.com/beancount/beangrow/pull/31
Le lundi 27 janvier 2025 à 08:02:44 UTC-5, Mariano Draghi a écrit :
> Oh! Kudos for the redesign Andreas!
>
> I've just updated the plugin, the new charts and tabs look really nice,
> and useful.
>
> Cheers!
>
> El Sunday, January 26, 2025 a la(s) 7:43:07 PM UTC-3, Andreas Gerstmayr
> escribió:
>
>> Am 18.01.25 um 11:09 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
>> > - Fava Portfolio Returns -> ?
>>
>> Works fine with Beancount 3, I recently upgraded to Beancount 3 myself.
>>
>> The latest version also added more interactivity, multiple new pages and
>> charts. Let me know if you encounter any issues.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andreas
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/3ab63a42-8441-4123-8102-ee153276e8e1n%40googlegroups.com.
