On 17/10/24 23:10, ma...@jakobschnitzer.de wrote:
Yep, I'm working on the PR that Mariano linked to support both Beancount
v2 and v3 in parallel - I'll probably merge that to main in the coming
days, then this can see some wider testing :)
Hello Jakob,
I had a very cursory look at the PR a while ago and I noticed that you
are using some parts of beanquery that I would consider private API and
implementation details that are very likely to change.
I didn't comment on the PR at that time because I was planning to
publish some documentation for beanquery soon, including some API
documentation, and that would have helped define how to do what you need
with what is intended to be the public API. Unfortunately, I haven't
really had as much time as I was hoping to work on the documentation,
thus it hasn't materialized yet. Therefore, this is a warning that some
of the parts of beanquery you are accessing are likely to change.
I would suggest to wait a little bit before merging your PR and work on
getting what you need into the public beanquery API. Knowing that you
are working on this, I'll prioritize getting minimal API documentation
out ASAP, most likely over the weekend.
Cheers,
Dan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/9f12b6cc-7791-429b-af47-71f16a154dae%40grinta.net.
