In Coinbase Pro under the Portfolio > Withdrawals tab you can expand each 
line item to see the fee, subtotal, etc. The Account statement doesn't 
include a Fee column so there's no way to export the fees for withdrawals. 
The Fills statement does show fees for trades.

There are a number of solutions to high network fees. The currently viable 
option is to bridge tokens to alternative chains such as Avalanche, 
Polygon, Solana, etc. When Ethereum finally transitions to Proof-of-Stake 
there are supposed to be improvements to the scalability and high fee 
issues.
On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 1:30:02 PM UTC-5 bl...@furius.ca wrote:

> I used 
>   (User) > Statements > Statements Tab > Generate > Account
> but I didn't realize there were separate network fees.
> How do you find them in CB pro?
> The fees I see appear to match the "Fee" lines in the All Activity tab.
>
> I have to say two things:
> - the fees are crazy high, it doesn't bode well for this idea of a future 
> where crypto is used for payments. I'm relatively new to this this year, 
> and I was stunned by the amounts of the fees when I first looked at it.
> - the data coming out of Coinbase is not great. Why can't they report the 
> price of transactions? That wouldn't be hard. You basically have to 
> download and compute yourself. I have no idea why they do that.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 8:11 AM Reed Law <ree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I was not able to get this importer (or v3) to run so I wrote a Coinbase 
>> Pro importer for v2: https://github.com/reedlaw/beancount_coinbase_pro
>>
>> One thing I found is that the transaction logs don't record the network 
>> fees for withdrawing cryptocurrencies. You either have to separately import 
>> the wallet transactions or manually copy the fees from the Coinbase Pro 
>> "Withdrawal" tab for each token.
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 4:43:28 PM UTC-5 bl...@furius.ca wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 4:27 PM Alan H <al...@polyphase.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm in agreement too - having recently suffered exactly this issue; 
>>>> remembering how I implemented the importers and fixing some dates (and 
>>>> wishing I had written unittests). 
>>>>
>>>> Martin; is beanbuff a private repo? I don't see the example CSV 
>>>> importer in github.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ooops you're right. I think I took it private a while ago because the 
>>> work I was doing on Johnny (https://github.com/beancount/johnny) was 
>>> obsoleting large chunks of beanbuff. 
>>> I made it public again, and I'll update the README instead. I have to 
>>> update the importers in there that intersect with Johnny (which has much 
>>> more sophisticated imports for those).
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alan
>>>> On Sunday, December 5, 2021 at 9:40:57 PM UTC b...@bben.us wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sounds great, and aligned with the ethos of v3 splitting and 
>>>>> generalizing.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 1:20 PM Martin Blais <bl...@furius.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's been a while since I've done much, but a few weekends ago I 
>>>>>> rewrote all my CSV importers.
>>>>>> I had new changes to update my code for, and I was also behind on 
>>>>>> updating from changes from updates in beangulp.
>>>>>> Some nice experience came out of it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I had been unhappy with the object-oriented mixins and CSV importer 
>>>>>> that's in beangulp for a long time. 
>>>>>> Looking around for which file provided which implementation was 
>>>>>> always a bit annoying.
>>>>>> It's a lot simpler to have a single protocol (beangulp.Importer) with 
>>>>>> all abstract methods and just implementations of that (no inheritance of 
>>>>>> functionality).
>>>>>> In fact, even if I have to duplicate some code in the implementation, 
>>>>>> I'm still happier with the result that way.
>>>>>> The simplicity is worth the repetition and having all the code 
>>>>>> locally visible in a single file is advantageous, especially since this 
>>>>>> is 
>>>>>> the type of thing that you end up doing reluctantly (in general when I'm 
>>>>>> doing accounting imports the last thing I want to do is having to hack 
>>>>>> to 
>>>>>> adapt code due to changed file formats; the easier I can make it the 
>>>>>> better).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As it turns out, a heavily configurable CSV importer is not best 
>>>>>> served by a class + config abstraction. It's a lot simpler to read and 
>>>>>> massage the input table with "petl" to convert the types (dates and 
>>>>>> numbers, mostly), normalize the column names and then call a generic 
>>>>>> little 
>>>>>> helper function to construct Transaction instances. For many of my 
>>>>>> simple 
>>>>>> CSVs, I've been using this extremely simple helper:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/beancount/beangulp/blob/master/beangulp/petl_utils.py#L16
>>>>>> and these parser functions:
>>>>>> https://github.com/beancount/beangulp/blob/master/beangulp/utils.py
>>>>>> The petl code really is as simple - and much more powerful - than a 
>>>>>> custom configuration that attempts to support all variations and think 
>>>>>> ahead about all the possibilities.
>>>>>> This is the key: that code *is* the transformation configuration, and 
>>>>>> the petl API is quite elegant and minimal in that way.
>>>>>> (If you're interested in more involved usage of petl you can look 
>>>>>> here: https://github.com/beancount/johnny/tree/master/johnny/sources)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's an example of such a CSV importer using petl (but not the 
>>>>>> helper above, this one creates transactions for groups of rows with the 
>>>>>> same id):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/beancount/beanbuff/blob/master/beanbuff/coinbase/coinbase_csv.py
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I ended up with is so much easier to work with when debugging is 
>>>>>> needed that I'm tempted to declare the CSV importer implementation 
>>>>>> that's 
>>>>>> in beangulp deprecated.
>>>>>> I'm referring to all the files under 
>>>>>> https://github.com/beancount/beangulp/tree/master/beangulp/importers/
>>>>>> I have no intention of adding to that functionality going forward.
>>>>>> I think we should even probably delete the mixins and it on the next 
>>>>>> release. I have a feeling nobody's been using them anyway (nobody ever 
>>>>>> asked questions about them, I was probably alone using them) and it's 
>>>>>> less 
>>>>>> code to maintain. If you rely on them say something. 
>>>>>> We could add a tag for the last version with them available.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "Beancount" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to beancount+...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAK21%2BhPNuL1yFhzn91pAgHRKBaG0r8%2BYMhzOKNcj4-kb65%3D_mw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAK21%2BhPNuL1yFhzn91pAgHRKBaG0r8%2BYMhzOKNcj4-kb65%3D_mw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Beancount" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to beancount+...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/38571e34-ce10-4ef4-b02d-6068a53eafa7n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/38571e34-ce10-4ef4-b02d-6068a53eafa7n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Beancount" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to beancount+...@googlegroups.com.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/c9de5ff1-8118-4ac6-9ec8-afa592592c2an%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/c9de5ff1-8118-4ac6-9ec8-afa592592c2an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/4820e8d3-93a0-4d35-9204-884e65c0faabn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to