On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:09:27PM -0700, Max Katsev wrote:
> Fair enough. I wanted to know if I'm missing something about the purpose of 
> tracking cost in beancount and I guess the answer that it's mainly for tax 
> reasons.
> 
> It's not that I'm philosophically opposed to it, more like I have 5+ years 
> of transactions without the cost basis and I'm not sure how to start using 
> it now without having to backfill everything at once. Is there a good way 
> to record the lots I currently own (according to the brokerage) without 
> filling in all the history that led to their creation?
> 
> Although I'm still not clear on why I should consider it income when my 
> 401k provider decides to automatically swap out the ETF I own to a 
> different share class with a different ticker and price.

If you're looking for solidarity: you're not alone. I also think it's a
bit odd to consider that income.

But practically speaking, I need to get my taxes done, so I account for
things the way my tax authorities want me to. (Sometimes it involves
some mental gymnastics; see my other recent thread.)

-- 
James

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/20210423175319.asfpy4f3dz3w5ghq%40moth.falsifian.org.

Reply via email to