A possible approach could be to get involved in replicating the missing functionality into fava rather than to maintaining it in bean-count?
On Friday, 17 July 2020 08:16:39 UTC+1, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Martin Blais <bl...@furius.ca <javascript:>> [2020-07-05 23:04]: > > I just deleted: > > - bean-report (use bean-query or Fava) > > I'm not sure that's a great idea. While bean-report was a second > class citizen compared to bean-query, it has some functionality > missing from bean-query, e.g. bean-report print > > bean-report holdings is also pretty nice. > > Is someone planning on maintaining bean-report for v3? > > -- > Martin Michlmayr > https://www.cyrius.com/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/f1bb1cbb-fbe9-4a8a-9bf3-e22762b987e4o%40googlegroups.com.
