On 23/01/2019 09:22, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> I also forgot to mention that this version drops the cache for account >> names used for completion. I tested it on a ledger of mines with more >> than two years of personal transactions and completion is instantaneous. >> However, I would appreciate if users with very large ledgers would test >> it and let me know how responsive it feels. > > I've tried it on my ledger --- 5 years, 8 K transactions, 2 MB ledger in > beancount format --- and it still feels very responsive; I wouldn't say > it feels *instantaneous*, but it's still waaaay acceptable.
Nice to hear, thank you. I'll try to setup some benchmarking and see if the completion candidates collection can be optimized a bit. It may be worth exploring something using syntax-ppss-cache for that. Cheers, Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/25f5dcf1-f344-4e13-f3ba-3308166630b2%40grinta.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
