It's also described here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/beagleboard/Robert$20Nelson$20remoteproc|sort:date/beagleboard/LOaTgWH7Tpo/T0eote3TAQAJ
in John's first post. Which was from Roberts original "how to" post several
months back it seems.

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:03 PM, William Hermans <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, Gregs' working kernel is from before this change. So only had
> remoteproc ability. Where these new kernels have the ability to enable
> either / or.
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Neil Jubinville <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Look up in this thread to Robert's post I believe both are disabled.  You
>> have to choose one and enable it.
>>
>> On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 5:52:59 PM UTC-7, William Hermans wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Greg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I didn't adjust anything in the device tree.  I never had to do that
>>>> before to successfully run the Remoteproc examples.  The only thing I have
>>>> ever had to tweak is the pull-up/down resistors in the pads.
>>>>
>>>> When I run lsmod, I am seeing normal Remoteproc drivers after modprobe
>>>> commands, except for the rpmsg driver which is not getting inserted when I
>>>> think it should.
>>>>
>>>> I would think there is at least some element of the device tree entries
>>>> in /sys which are independent of loadable kernel modules?
>>>> I'm trying to understand the approach to debug this type of problem.
>>>> I think I need to verify solid device tree entries for the PRUs and go
>>>> from there.  ???
>>>>
>>>>
>>> So a while back, in one of the board overlay, or regular overlays, maybe
>>> one of the includes( I forget which ) Robert had comments, and commented
>>> out code for enabling UIO, or remoteproc in the latest TI kernels. I'm not
>>> sure if the newer version of these files have the remoteproc includes
>>> commented out or not. So what I'm saying here may not apply.
>>>
>>> Let me search the groups here and find what I'm thinking of.
>>>
>> --
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>> gid/beagleboard/58a346dc-09ce-4e54-aa2b-ac48f52275aa%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/58a346dc-09ce-4e54-aa2b-ac48f52275aa%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORofVCBhpSwA3Ds%2B2Mzdy%2B5YgcAfkGC%3D%2Bv9Bam8g9QyLxQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to