I think my house mate put it perfectly.

*He seems like a smart person who knows hows to copy / paste text. Ignore
> him.*
>

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:26 AM, William Hermans <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm a hater of people who consistently have to have the last word on a
> subject they obviously know nothing about. All you did to this discussion
> was create confusion, and yet another rabbit hole to explore. You have not
> even answered my original question, and you do not even realize it.
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:50 AM, John Syne <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yep, perfectly clear. You are a hater and there is no hope for you.
>> Strange how the few conflicts on this forum have always involved you as one
>> of the parties. I don’t recall any other conflicts that did not involve
>> you. Perhaps you need professional help to get over your anger issues.
>> Anyway, good luck to you.
>>
>> Regards,
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2016, at 9:40 AM, William Hermans <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> *What a shitty attitude. I don’t mind helping people out who appreciate
>>> the help, but why would anyone help you when you all you do is complain
>>> about the help. *
>>> *Regards,*
>>>
>> *John*
>>
>> It's not just anyone who gets this special treatment. Just you. I dont
>> like you, have told you this repeatedly and yet you feel compelled to
>> inject yourself into discussions I start, or participate in. I even told
>> you I would have nothing further to say to you ever. And you again felt
>> compelled to inject yourself into this discussion.
>>
>> But hey, who knows, maybe someday you'll get the hint.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:48 AM, John Syne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> What a shitty attitude. I don’t mind helping people out who appreciate
>>> the help, but why would anyone help you when you all you do is complain
>>> about the help.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 20, 2016, at 1:18 AM, William Hermans <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> *I just don’t understand what you are asking for. The code is self
>>>> explanatory and with a little effort, you can make it work. My guess is you
>>>> want me to add the include headers and create the Makefile and Kconfig
>>>> files. If that is what you want, I can do it for you, but I thought you
>>>> would know how to do this yourself. Take a book and read about sigaction.
>>>> I’m sure you will find examples just like the ones I sent you. I’ve pulled
>>>> code like this together for year to understand how comms works between the
>>>> kernel and user space.  *
>>>> *Regards,*
>>>>
>>> *John*
>>>
>>> Dont do it for me, because I do not need it. Do it for all those
>>> interested people you mentioned before.
>>>
>>> You say it's easy, and you're pasting in random code here in there, but
>>> I've yet to see you come up with a real, and solid solution. You keep
>>> talking around the subject like it's simple . . .so put your money where
>>> your mouth is.
>>>
>>> Either that, or stop "talking", because you're not helping anyone.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:59 AM, John Syne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just don’t understand what you are asking for. The code is self
>>>> explanatory and with a little effort, you can make it work. My guess is you
>>>> want me to add the include headers and create the Makefile and Kconfig
>>>> files. If that is what you want, I can do it for you, but I thought you
>>>> would know how to do this yourself. Take a book and read about sigaction.
>>>> I’m sure you will find examples just like the ones I sent you. I’ve pulled
>>>> code like this together for year to understand how comms works between the
>>>> kernel and user space.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 20, 2016, at 12:45 AM, William Hermans <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well that is not how I'd do things, and I suppose that code if complete
>>>> and integrated into the tps65217.c file, it might work . . .
>>>>
>>>> But as I said that code is not complete, and is what looks like example
>>>> code out of some Documentation/*txt file.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:14 PM, John Syne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 19, 2016, at 9:28 PM, William Hermans <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not what I was saying at all. I'm saying if all this is that
>>>>> easy for you, then you should add this functionality, and be the community
>>>>> hero.
>>>>>
>>>>> This sort of thing is definitely not above my pay grade, but I am not
>>>>> a kernel hacker, and I do not know the file structure all that well. So it
>>>>> would take me a while to to figure out everything I need to know, about
>>>>> everything I'd need. So if this thing is really that easy for you, why
>>>>> don't you make a new LKM, something that takes an argument, or two. LIke
>>>>> g_multi where you pass in a path for the g_mass_storage bit of the driver.
>>>>> Except of course, you want to be able to set a time out for a shutdown.
>>>>>
>>>>> Second, a kernel module should not require a specific init daemon.
>>>>> That goes against the whole point of Linux.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI I could do this entirely in userspace, really easily. Except I
>>>>> would have to poll, instead of using an interrupt, and I pretty much be
>>>>> writing duplicate code, or code that does a duplicate job. But passed that
>>>>> I really do not have to time for this, or to read through, and understand
>>>>> all the required Linux kernel, and LKMs to do this "properly". It's a lot
>>>>> of work for someone who really doesn't know what they're doing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, it can be done in user space as well. Simply add sigaction to the
>>>>> tps65217 mfd driver. Here is an example of a standalone KM with a user
>>>>> space app. So now we do not use input key, but send events via kernel
>>>>> signals (similar to kill -9 pid or ctrl-c).
>>>>>
>>>>> Kernel Code:
>>>>>
>>>>> ===
>>>>> #define SIG_TEST 44 // we choose 44 as our signal number (real-time
>>>>> signals are in the range of 33 to 64)
>>>>>
>>>>> struct dentry *file;
>>>>>
>>>>> static ssize_t write_pid(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
>>>>>                                 size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>>>>> {
>>>>> char mybuf[10];
>>>>> int pid = 0;
>>>>> int ret;
>>>>> struct siginfo info;
>>>>> struct task_struct *t;
>>>>> /* read the value from user space */
>>>>> if(count > 10)
>>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>> copy_from_user(mybuf, buf, count);
>>>>> sscanf(mybuf, "%d", &pid);
>>>>> printk("pid = %d\n", pid);
>>>>>
>>>>> /* send the signal */
>>>>> memset(&info, 0, sizeof(struct siginfo));
>>>>> info.si_signo = SIG_TEST;
>>>>> info.si_code = SI_QUEUE; // this is bit of a trickery: SI_QUEUE is
>>>>> normally used by sigqueue from user space,
>>>>> // and kernel space should use SI_KERNEL. But if SI_KERNEL is used the
>>>>> real_time data
>>>>> // is not delivered to the user space signal handler function.
>>>>> info.si_int = 1234;   //real time signals may have 32 bits of data.
>>>>>
>>>>> rcu_read_lock();
>>>>> // t = find_task_by_pid_type(PIDTYPE_PID, pid);  //find the
>>>>> task_struct associated with this pid
>>>>> t = pid_task(find_pid_ns(pid, &init_pid_ns), PIDTYPE_PID);
>>>>> if(t == NULL){
>>>>> printk("no such pid\n");
>>>>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>>> }
>>>>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>>>> ret = send_sig_info(SIG_TEST, &info, t);    //send the signal
>>>>> if (ret < 0) {
>>>>> printk("error sending signal\n");
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>> }
>>>>> return count;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static const struct file_operations my_fops = {
>>>>> .write = write_pid,
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> static int __init signalexample_module_init(void)
>>>>> {
>>>>> /* we need to know the pid of the user space process
>>>>>   * -> we use debugfs for this. As soon as a pid is written to
>>>>>   * this file, a signal is sent to that pid
>>>>>   */
>>>>> /* only root can write to this file (no read) */
>>>>> file = debugfs_create_file("signalconfpid", 0200, NULL, NULL,
>>>>> &my_fops);
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> static void __exit signalexample_module_exit(void)
>>>>> {
>>>>> debugfs_remove(file);
>>>>>
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> ===
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> User Space Code:
>>>>>
>>>>> ===
>>>>> #define SIG_TEST 44 /* we define our own signal, hard coded since
>>>>> SIGRTMIN is different in user and in kernel space */
>>>>>
>>>>> void receiveData(int n, siginfo_t *info, void *unused) {
>>>>> printf("received value %i\n", info->si_int);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> int main ( int argc, char **argv )
>>>>> {
>>>>> int configfd;
>>>>> char buf[10];
>>>>> /* setup the signal handler for SIG_TEST
>>>>>   * SA_SIGINFO -> we want the signal handler function with 3 arguments
>>>>>   */
>>>>> struct sigaction sig;
>>>>> sig.sa_sigaction = receiveData;
>>>>> sig.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
>>>>> sigaction(SIG_TEST, &sig, NULL);
>>>>>
>>>>> /* kernel needs to know our pid to be able to send us a signal ->
>>>>>   * we use debugfs for this -> do not forget to mount the debugfs!
>>>>>   */
>>>>> configfd = open("/sys/kernel/debug/signalconfpid", O_WRONLY);
>>>>> if(configfd < 0) {
>>>>> perror("open");
>>>>> return -1;
>>>>> }
>>>>> sprintf(buf, "%i", getpid());
>>>>> if (write(configfd, buf, strlen(buf) + 1) < 0) {
>>>>> perror("fwrite");
>>>>> return -1;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> ===
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Lastly, when I say "really easily" I mean that I know it is possible
>>>>> and I know how to go about doing it. I'd just have to research many things
>>>>> to bring it all together. So would also take me a little while. Maybe a
>>>>> week, maybe two. Assuming I had the time.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:51 PM, John Syne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is the problem with that. You use a different kernel to me and
>>>>>> you don’t like to use systemd. Hence I will explain how to get this
>>>>>> working, but you are going to have to do the coding and testing. To start
>>>>>> with, which kernel are you using?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From the TPS65217 datasheet the ACI bit in the INT register (0x02)
>>>>>> will be a 1 if the power status changed (either power on or power fail).
>>>>>> The state of the power is in the status register (0xA) which is 0 for no
>>>>>> power and 1 for power in valid range. So looking at the Interrupt 
>>>>>> routing,
>>>>>> both events are reported. I would recommend changing the input key to
>>>>>> something different to KEY_POWER because we do not want to modify the pwr
>>>>>> button behavior.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (int_reg & TPS65217_INT_ACI) {
>>>>>> /* Handle AC power status change */
>>>>>> dev_dbg(tps->dev, "AC power status change\n");
>>>>>> /* Press KEY_POWER when AC not present */
>>>>>> input_report_key(tps->pwr_but, KEY_POWER,
>>>>>> ~status_reg & TPS65217_STATUS_ACPWR);
>>>>>> input_sync(tps->pwr_but);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You might have to change input_report_key to input_report_switch as
>>>>>> I’m not sure if we can extract the status from EV_KEY.
>>>>>> Using udev, the input key is linked to this systemd service
>>>>>> poweroff.target
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ===
>>>>>> #  This file is part of systemd.
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> #  systemd is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>>>>>> #  under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as
>>>>>> published by
>>>>>> #  the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or
>>>>>> #  (at your option) any later version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Unit]
>>>>>> Description=Power-Off
>>>>>> Documentation=man:systemd.special(7)
>>>>>> DefaultDependencies=no
>>>>>> Requires=systemd-poweroff.service
>>>>>> After=systemd-poweroff.service
>>>>>> AllowIsolate=yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Install]
>>>>>> Alias=ctrl-alt-del.target
>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which in turn runs the systemd-poweroff.service
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ===
>>>>>> #  This file is part of systemd.
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> #  systemd is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>>>>>> #  under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as
>>>>>> published by
>>>>>> #  the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or
>>>>>> #  (at your option) any later version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Unit]
>>>>>> Description=Power-Off
>>>>>> Documentation=man:systemd-halt.service(8)
>>>>>> DefaultDependencies=no
>>>>>> Requires=shutdown.target umount.target final.target
>>>>>> After=shutdown.target umount.target final.target
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Service]
>>>>>> Type=oneshot
>>>>>> ExecStart=/bin/systemctl --force poweroff
>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which powers down the board.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So here is what you need to do. When you receive a input key assigned
>>>>>> to AC_Power, with a status of fail, start a daemon with a timer. If the
>>>>>> timer expires, do the same systemctl poweroff or shutdown -h now. If you
>>>>>> get a input key for AC_Power with status of power_good before the timer
>>>>>> expires, either kill the daemon or cancel the timer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope this helps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> John
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2016, at 6:29 PM, William Hermans <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good, now add it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:16 PM, John Syne <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In my last e-mail on this issue, I said "Also, the interrupt routine
>>>>>>> does not report power good, so that would have to be added”. It is a 
>>>>>>> simple
>>>>>>> thing to add.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2016, at 3:30 PM, William Hermans <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So there is apparently a bug related to this whole situation. Once
>>>>>>> the input power goes away, whatever it may be. You lose USB, because the
>>>>>>> PMIC is not longer able to supply 5V. You even get a kernel message in
>>>>>>> relation to this from musb.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The problem is, once input power is restored, I see no indication
>>>>>>> that 5V is restored to USB. So If you tail -f /var/log/messages, you'll 
>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>> one musb message when pulling power, but you will not see a 
>>>>>>> corresponding
>>>>>>> message when plugging power back in. Additionally if you pull power
>>>>>>> multiple times. Only the first message is displayed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What this tells me is that the current kernel modules are not
>>>>>>> written to deal / handle this yet. So for now, unless I'm wrong ( which 
>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>> doubt ). It's best just to power down period. After input power goes 
>>>>>>> away,
>>>>>>> and simply use an R/C network to "time" system up's, in case power goes 
>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>> / down rapidly. One, or more times consecutively.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:26 PM, William Hermans <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *I have an interest in this.  It's way above my pay grade from a
>>>>>>>>> programming perspective...*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Mike*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is actually something I'm personally very interested in too.
>>>>>>>> However, at this moment in time, my buddy and I are actually in the 
>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>> of making two different capes for the beaglebone. So this is one of 
>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>> situations where you have to have priorities . . . and while I 
>>>>>>>> obviously do
>>>>>>>> not know everything involved to get this certain thing done, it is not
>>>>>>>> above my pay grade.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So perhaps in the future, it may be something I'll revisit, and
>>>>>>>> would be something I'd contribute back to the community.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 04/18/2016 03:31 PM, John Syne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That is OK if this doesn’t work for you, but there are other BBB
>>>>>>>>> users who might find this helpful. Currently the powerfail uses the 
>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>> key function as the pwr button, so the first place to start would be
>>>>>>>>> changing the key function to something else. Also, the interrupt 
>>>>>>>>> routine
>>>>>>>>> does not report power good, so that would have to be added. After 
>>>>>>>>> that, a
>>>>>>>>> systemd service could take care of the rest.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have an interest in this.  It's way above my pay grade from a
>>>>>>>>> programming perspective...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:31 AM, William Hermans <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #1
>>>>>>>>> william@beaglebone:~$ ls /etc/udev/rules.d/
>>>>>>>>> 50-hidraw.rules  50-spi.rules  60-omap-tty.rules
>>>>>>>>> 70-persistent-net.rules  uio.rules
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #2
>>>>>>>>> We do not care about the button press. We *did* care about what
>>>>>>>>> happens when power is removed, while a battery is connected.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now we do not care. We're not going to bother with it. It's too
>>>>>>>>> much hassle for a result that is not really all that important. So 
>>>>>>>>> what if
>>>>>>>>> the power down routine is inefficient . . . it works.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:29 AM, John Syne < <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I asked Robert how the pwr button is processed and interestingly
>>>>>>>>>> it is done via udev and systemd. Also, there is some new code going
>>>>>>>>>> mainstream for the pwr button and battery charger. Perhaps you can
>>>>>>>>>> implement the timer delay via a custom systemd service. Here is what 
>>>>>>>>>> Robert
>>>>>>>>>> sent me:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh this is finally getting upstreamed:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg127184.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I need to switch to their version, vs our 3.8.13 erra hack that's
>>>>>>>>>> been forward ported for years. ;)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Behind the scenes's that patch is reporting a key-event to
>>>>>>>>>> systemd...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/09541e49ebd17b41482e447dd8194942f39788c0/src/login/70-power-switch.rules#L13
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 11:06 PM, William Hermans <
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is no timer in that code. The timer would have to be added,
>>>>>>>>>> and careful consideration would have to be given to exactly how that 
>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>> implemented.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So in other words, you would, or should write a completely new
>>>>>>>>>> kernel module, that is meant to replace what already exists - As an 
>>>>>>>>>> option.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:25 PM, evilwulfie <
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Where in the code do you set that timer ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/17/2016 7:50 PM, John Syne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> One more thing, the power down sequence uses the RTC framework
>>>>>>>>>>> (described earlier in this thread), so it will be possible to set a 
>>>>>>>>>>> timer
>>>>>>>>>>> for the shutdown and the wait for the power to return event to 
>>>>>>>>>>> cancel the
>>>>>>>>>>> timer. If the power on event does not occur, the shutdown will 
>>>>>>>>>>> occur.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 7:18 PM, evilwulfie < <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting.  Too bad if you want the battery to act as a UPS it
>>>>>>>>>>> cant some how notify the kernel that AC has been removed
>>>>>>>>>>> and have a routine to just chill a while to see if power comes
>>>>>>>>>>> back.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Be nice to have a variable that is user settable for the time
>>>>>>>>>>> between loss of AC and shutdown.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As it is now it sees the AC removed, shuts down and no easy way
>>>>>>>>>>> to restart on power restored. Requiring some other IC to monitor 
>>>>>>>>>>> power
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and then press the pwr_but to restart the processor.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/17/2016 7:10 PM, John Syne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, it is in the BB kernel:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/RobertCNelson/bb-kernel/blob/am33x-v4.1/patches/beaglebone/dts/0006-tps65217-Enable-KEY_POWER-press-on-AC-loss-PWR_BUT.patch>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/RobertCNelson/bb-kernel/blob/am33x-v4.1/patches/beaglebone/dts/0006-tps65217-Enable-KEY_POWER-press-on-AC-loss-PWR_BUT.patch
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So again, on line 164 is the Interrupt routing. It is this line:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> + input_report_key(tps->pwr_but, KEY_POWER,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> + ~status_reg & TPS65217_STATUS_ACPWR);
>>>>>>>>>>> that send a power button pressed as an input key when the AC 5V
>>>>>>>>>>> power is removed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 4:52 PM, William Hermans <
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The real reason why our source trees do not match up. My source
>>>>>>>>>>> tree is based on 4.1.x, and yours seems to be 3.8.x. The patch you 
>>>>>>>>>>> showed
>>>>>>>>>>> above would probably botch up my source tree . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 4:33 PM, William Hermans <
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah I recognize that code from source code not written by TI
>>>>>>>>>>>> employees. The file is called tps65217_charger.c, and is written 
>>>>>>>>>>>> by an
>>>>>>>>>>>> employee of another company.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, I think we're going to blow this off. The idea was to
>>>>>>>>>>>> wait around without power for 5 minutes, to see if power comes 
>>>>>>>>>>>> back up.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Before issuing a shutdown. Then, on the power up end, using a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> simple R/C
>>>>>>>>>>>> circuit to ramp up voltage to 5v over a specific time period.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/en-us/lp-safe-emailing-2109?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=oa-2109-v2-a>
>>>>>>>>>>> Virus-free.
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/en-us/lp-safe-emailing-2109?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=oa-2109-v2-a>
>>>>>>>>>>> www.avast.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit  <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to  <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/571443FC.6020505%40gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/571443FC.6020505%40gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit  <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit  <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to  <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/2CC5F218-6933-45E8-8B84-2CEE08263AF5%40gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/2CC5F218-6933-45E8-8B84-2CEE08263AF5%40gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit  <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/en-us/lp-safe-emailing-2109?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=oa-2109-v2-a>
>>>>>>>>>>> Virus-free.
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/en-us/lp-safe-emailing-2109?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=oa-2109-v2-a>
>>>>>>>>>>> www.avast.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit  <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to  <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/57146FB7.5000301%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/57146FB7.5000301%40gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit  <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit  <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
>>>>>>>>>> http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to  <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORqGgChYUiW8na9wJqDQNW3_tOXn4YW4Rrhqe0UyCzDGWg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORqGgChYUiW8na9wJqDQNW3_tOXn4YW4Rrhqe0UyCzDGWg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit  <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to  <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/8482E576-E05F-4B45-8F30-87B0AFA8D211%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/8482E576-E05F-4B45-8F30-87B0AFA8D211%40gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit  <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORqf9j0x91u0XAM1KJLBrc9zMwk_-yzvLMhT3LGagnahyQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORqf9j0x91u0XAM1KJLBrc9zMwk_-yzvLMhT3LGagnahyQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/053B71E7-CF39-4B7C-A7A5-615C9EB197E7%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/053B71E7-CF39-4B7C-A7A5-615C9EB197E7%40gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/5715510F.8000408%40gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/5715510F.8000408%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORr_TRRtZSnUmo-xQFmh%2B8u_RcDXU5zEJjw7ONpg4eOZ5w%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORr_TRRtZSnUmo-xQFmh%2B8u_RcDXU5zEJjw7ONpg4eOZ5w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/3FE12548-00AA-458C-9CB2-A47F0C8AB5A9%40gmail.com
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/3FE12548-00AA-458C-9CB2-A47F0C8AB5A9%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORogR8Ahz1hmp0NAohsLGCO3XqTUowDPmAiPE0azY2AgdQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORogR8Ahz1hmp0NAohsLGCO3XqTUowDPmAiPE0azY2AgdQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/D0317723-FE78-4873-87FD-1DE8C5FAE57B%40gmail.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/D0317723-FE78-4873-87FD-1DE8C5FAE57B%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORrfjv%3DQcrLP%3DpbphSJAFe%2Bf%2B2seAQd%2Bpuq7gGomdM1UuQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORrfjv%3DQcrLP%3DpbphSJAFe%2Bf%2B2seAQd%2Bpuq7gGomdM1UuQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/E4F48D04-8F9A-4B26-8439-10E878DE2767%40gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/E4F48D04-8F9A-4B26-8439-10E878DE2767%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORoHsyHaqMnzK1C_E2Rt2zQcWE1PMASS0S6vgDxDiOxCGw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORoHsyHaqMnzK1C_E2Rt2zQcWE1PMASS0S6vgDxDiOxCGw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/C3044AEC-BE7C-4510-B7D7-CF5B97E47806%40gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/C3044AEC-BE7C-4510-B7D7-CF5B97E47806%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORq1byP6i%2Bq8%3D_4H6REasjJDjGzcqZho5pHD8x2xaGN1Mg%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORq1byP6i%2Bq8%3D_4H6REasjJDjGzcqZho5pHD8x2xaGN1Mg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/147FA705-1647-42E1-9828-3B868F69E8D2%40gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/147FA705-1647-42E1-9828-3B868F69E8D2%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORq9pTR%2By4_gcj6eZk7DvQZyZHUUZ6b5E640JP7QDs5ShQ%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORq9pTR%2By4_gcj6eZk7DvQZyZHUUZ6b5E640JP7QDs5ShQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>> --
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/E03BE0ED-DD71-4472-B174-3B00B5CC2AB7%40gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/E03BE0ED-DD71-4472-B174-3B00B5CC2AB7%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORpf228n9V6o5g0K67_tEg98Mq%2BW1DF8uqPuTCXfi%3DFPOw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to