OK. I took my Rev.C unit (1c:ba:8c:d9:5e:dd) and loaded "bone-debian-8.1-lxqt-4gb-armhf-2015-07-05-4gb.img" onto a 16 GB uSD card. Unit, power supply and card are "trusted."
Absolutely no changes to the image, just install, boot, run. No updates, additions or modifications. No cape, only connections are 5V power and Ethernet. Times are GMT/UTC. I define the boot completion as the time when systemd updates the internal time from the network. Initial boot completion: Jul 12 19:12:09 Autonomous reboot: Jul 13 10:54:19 This time it took 15 hours for the autonomous reboot to occur. I'll let this one keep going, and report. --- Graham == On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:13 AM, William Hermans <[email protected]> wrote: > *(3) System bb4f8e still has 4.1.0-rc8-bone9 #1 Wed Jun 17 00:05:43 UTC >> 2015 armv7l GNU/Linux: but cpufreq-set -g performance: no more reboot* > > > Interesting . . . If memory serves correctly, that was the "fix" for an > older kernel. So possibly older code crept into the newer ? > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:35 PM, 'dl4mea' via BeagleBoard < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Results from overnight test: >> >> I used the worst rebooters for some tests: >> >> (1) System bb1cf1 got installed with 3.19.3-bone4: *no more reboot* >> uptime >> 03:23:37 up 14:50, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.05 >> >> (2) System bb6c1f: installed with 4.1.1-ti-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jul 8 >> 17:03:29 UTC 2015 armv7l GNU/Linux: *2 reboots* >> Jul 13 00:55:17 bb6c1f kernel: [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical >> CPU 0x0 >> Jul 13 01:51:02 bb6c1f kernel: [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical >> CPU 0x0 >> >> (3) System bb4f8e still has 4.1.0-rc8-bone9 #1 Wed Jun 17 00:05:43 UTC >> 2015 armv7l GNU/Linux: but cpufreq-set -g performance: *no more reboot* >> uptime >> 03:29:57 up 9:01, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.06, 0.05 >> >> As I have to leave for the day, I will let all my systems run for at >> least 12h without changes. >> If then still like this, I will do (1) and (3) on some more devices. >> >> @RobertCNelson: If you have further suggestions which image to test, let >> me know. >> >> --- Guenter (dl4mea) >> >> -- >> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "BeagleBoard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/lF1X1XINjDo/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
